Performance-Level Results
Performance-Level Summary
Performance Levels for Age 9 in 2025
Level 150 Carry Out Simple, Discrete Reading Tasks
of students performed at or above 150 in 2025
Level 200 Demonstrate Partially Developed Skills and Understanding
of students performed at or above 200 in 2025
Level 250 Interrelate Ideas and Make Generalizations
of students performed at or above 250 in 2025
Performance-Level Trends
Higher percentages of 9-year-old students at or above 150 and 200 performance levels compared to 2022
Compared to 2022, the percentage of 9-year-olds performing at or above level 150 increased by 3 percentage points in 2025, and the percentage of 9-year-olds performing at or above level 200 increased by 4 percentage points. Compared to the pre-pandemic results in 2020, the percentages of students performing at or above each of the three performance levels were not significantly different in 2025. Compared to 1971, the percentages of students performing at or above each of the three performance levels were higher in 2025.
Click on a performance level from the “SET BASELINE AT LEVEL” options to see the percentage of students performing at or above that selected performance level.
Display As
Set baseline at level
Figure Trend in NAEP long-term trend reading performance-level results for 9‑year‑old students
Loading...
Long-term trend performance levels describe the range of reading skills demonstrated by students when responding to assessment questions of increasing difficulty. Within the NAEP long-term trend 0 to 500 reading scale, there are five performance levels: 150, 200, 250, 300, and 350. While all five performance levels are applicable at all three age groups (age 9, age 13, and age 17), younger students are more likely to successfully respond to questions that reflect the lower performance-level descriptions than to those that reflect the higher performance-level descriptions.
Results are reported as the percentages of students scoring at or above each performance level. For age 9, performance-level results are presented for at or above 150, 200, and 250. While some assessment questions are administered at more than one age group, cross-age comparisons in student performance results are not supported by the data. Because results are reported separately for age-based samples, performance-level descriptions should not be interpreted as indicating that students at different ages demonstrate equivalent skill profiles.