Lower percentage of eighth-grade students at or above NAEP Proficient compared to 2018
In 2022, thirteen percent of eighth-grade students performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level on the U.S. history assessment, which was 2 percentage points lower compared to 2018 and not significantly different from the first assessment year in 1994.
Sixty percent of eighth-grade students performed at or above the NAEP Basic level in 2022, which was 6 percentage points lower than in 2018 and not significantly different compared to 1994. One percent of eighth-grade students performed at the NAEP Advanced level, which was not significantly different in comparison to either 2018 or 1994.
NAEP achievement levels are performance standards that describe what students should know and be able to do. Results are reported as percentages of students performing at or above three achievement levels (NAEP Basic, NAEP Proficient, and NAEP Advanced). Students performing at or above the NAEP Proficient level on NAEP assessments demonstrate solid academic performance and competency over challenging subject matter. It should be noted that the NAEP Proficient achievement level does not represent grade-level proficiency as determined by other assessment standards (e.g., state or district assessments). NAEP achievement levels are to be used on a trial basis and should be interpreted and used with caution. Find out more about the NAEP U.S. history achievement levels.
Scroll down to explore NAEP achievement-level results for student groups.
NAEP achievement-level setting is based on the judgments of a broadly representative panel of teachers, education specialists, and members of the general public. The authorizing legislation for NAEP requires that the achievement levels be used on a trial basis until the Commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) determines that the achievement levels are reasonable, valid, and informative to the public (20 USC § 9622[e][2][C]). The NCES Commissioner’s determination is to be based on a congressionally mandated, rigorous, and independent evaluation. The latest evaluation of the achievement levels was conducted by a committee convened by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in 2016. The evaluation concluded that further evidence should be gathered to determine whether the achievement levels are reasonable, valid, and informative. Accordingly, the NCES Commissioner determined that the trial status of the achievement levels should be maintained at this time. Read more about how NAEP achievement levels are set. In 2018, the National Assessment Governing Board issued a revised Policy Statement clarifying that the NAEP Proficient level is not intended to reflect grade-level performance expectations but is specific to performance on NAEP assessments. Read the Governing Board Policy Statement.
The chart below lists the percentages of eighth-grade students performing at each of the NAEP U.S. history achievement levels in 2022 and previous assessment years. Set the baseline at either NAEP Basic or NAEP Proficient to see the percentages of students performing at or above that NAEP achievement level. Click "Show NAEP achievement-level breakdown" to see the percentages of eighth-grade students at each of the NAEP achievement levels. Click "Hide NAEP achievement-level breakdown" to see the percentages of students at or above the selected baseline NAEP achievement level. Use the slider to change focal years.
FigureTrend in eighth-grade NAEP U.S. history achievement-level results
Display As
Baseline
Loading...
NOTE: NAEP achievement levels are to be used on a trial basis and should be interpreted and used with caution.
Share this result:
NAEP Achievement Levels by Student Group
No significant changes in percentages of eighth-grade students at or above NAEP Proficient for most student groups compared to 2018
In 2022, there were no significant changes in the percentages of eighth-grade students who performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level in U.S. history for any reported student group compared to 2018 with one exception: a lower percentage of students attending city schools performed at or above NAEP Proficient.
In 2022, the percentages of students who performed at or above NAEP Basic were lower for many student groups in comparison to 2018, as follows:
students whose parents did not finish high school, students whose parents graduated from high school, students whose parents had some education after high school, and students whose parents graduated from college;
students attending public schools;
students attending public, noncharter schools;
students attending city and suburban schools;
students attending schools in the Midwest, South, and West regions;
The percentages of students who performed at or above the NAEP Proficient level in 2022 were not significantly different for any student group compared to the first assessment year in 1994. In comparison to 1994, the percentages of students who performed at or above the NAEP Basic level in 2022 were not significantly different for most student groups with two exceptions: the percentages were lower for students whose parents graduated from high school and for students whose parents had some education after high school.
The chart below lists the percentages of eighth-grade students performing at each of the NAEP U.S. history achievement levels in 2022 and previous assessment years. Set the baseline at either NAEP Basic or NAEP Proficient to see the percentages of students performing at or above that NAEP achievement level. Click "Show NAEP achievement-level breakdown" to see the percentages of eighth-grade students at each of the NAEP achievement levels. Click "Hide NAEP achievement-level breakdown" to see the percentages of students at or above the selected baseline NAEP achievement level. Use the slider to change focal years.
School location
down arrow
FigureTrend in eighth-grade NAEP U.S. history achievement-level results, by school location
Baseline
Loading...
Legend
NOTE: NAEP achievement levels are to be used on a trial basis and should be interpreted and used with caution.
NOTE: In 2018, the digitally based NAEP U.S. history assessment was administered for the first time. The 2018 U.S. history report includes results from students who took the digitally based assessment (DBA) and students who took the paper-based assessment (PBA). In 2022, all students took the digitally based U.S. history assessment. For more information, see the About page. The NAEP U.S. history scale ranges from 0 to 500. Accommodations were not permitted in the NAEP U.S. history assessment prior to 2001 at grade 8. Results are not shown for data points where the sample sizes are insufficient to permit a reliable estimate or where data are not available. Black includes African American, and Hispanic includes Latino. Race categories exclude Hispanic origin. In compliance with new standards from the U.S. Office of Management and Budget for collecting and reporting data on race/ethnicity, additional information was collected beginning in 2011 so that results could be reported separately for Asian students and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander students. Students who identified with two or more of the racial/ethnic groups (e.g., White and Black) would have been classified as "other" and reported as part of the "unclassified" category prior to 2011, and classified as "Two or More Races" in 2011 and later assessment years. Results for these students are presented under the "Two or More Races" category in the graphics and tables in this report. Trend results for "White," "Black," "Hispanic," "Asian/Pacific Islander," and "Two or More Races" presented in this report are based on the 6-category race/ethnicity variable with data available starting in early 1990s. For the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) eligibility category, results have been reported since 2003 when the quality of the data on students' eligibility for the program improved. Beginning in the 2014–15 school year, states could additionally categorize students as eligible for NSLP by including them in their Community Eligibility Provision; therefore, the percentage of students categorized as eligible has increased in comparison to 2013. Readers should interpret NSLP trend results with caution. The information about "Eligibility for the National School Lunch Program (NSLP)" variable is based on available school records. If school records were not available, the student was classified as "Information not available." The category "students with disabilities" includes students identified as having either an Individualized Education Program or protection under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The results for students with disabilities and English learners are based on students who were assessed and cannot be generalized to the total population of such students. See more information about student group variables. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding or omission of categories. Although the estimates (e.g., average scores or percentages) are shown as rounded numbers, the positions of the data points in the graphics are based on the unrounded numbers. Unrounded numbers were used for calculating the differences between the estimates, and for the statistical comparison test when the estimates were compared to each other. Not all apparent differences between estimates are statistically significant.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1994–2022 U.S. History Assessments.