National Trends and Student Skills
National Score Trends
Average mathematics score decreases for twelfth-graders compared to 2019; scores decrease for lower-performing students
Average scores are reported on the NAEP mathematics scale at grade 12 that ranges from 0 to 300. NAEP results are also reported at five selected percentiles to show score trends for lower- (10th and 25th percentiles), middle- (50th percentile), and higher- (75th and 90th percentiles) performing students. The percentile is defined by the percentage of students scoring lower than a particular scale score. For example, if the 25th percentile score is 120, it means that 25 percent of the students scored below 120.
- The average mathematics score for twelfth-graders in 2024 was 3 points lower than in 2019, and was also 3 points lower compared to 2005, the start of a new trendline marking the first administration of the assessment based on a new mathematics framework.
- Compared to 2019, the 2024 mathematics score was not significantly different for higher-performing students at the 90th percentile and decreased by 3 points for students at the 75th percentile. The score decreased for middle-performing students at the 50th percentile by 4 points. Scores decreased for lower-performing students at both the 10th and 25th percentiles by 5 points.
- Mathematics scores compared to 2005 were lower for lower-performing students at the 10th and 25th percentiles and middle-performing students at the 50th percentile. Scores in 2024 compared to 2005 were not significantly different for higher-performing students at the 75th and 90th percentiles.
Figure Average and selected percentile scores in NAEP mathematics for twelfth-grade students: Various years, 2005‒2024
National Achievement-level Trends
Lower percentage of twelfth-graders at or above NAEP Proficient compared to 2019
- In 2024, twenty-two percent of twelfth-grade students performed at or above the NAEP Proficient
- Fifty-five percent of twelfth-grade students performed at or above NAEP Basic
- Three percent of twelfth-grade students performed at the NAEP Advanced
- Forty-five percent of twelfth-grade students performed in the range of the scale below the NAEP Basic level in 2024, which is five percentage points higher compared to both 2019 and 2005.
NAEP achievement levels are performance standards that represent what students should know and be able to do. Results are reported as percentages of students performing at or above three achievement levels (NAEP Basic, NAEP Proficient, and NAEP Advanced). Students performing at or above the NAEP Proficient level on NAEP assessments demonstrate solid academic performance and competency over challenging subject matter. It should be noted that the NAEP Proficient achievement level does not represent grade-level proficiency as determined by other assessment standards (e.g., state or district assessments). NAEP achievement levels are to be used on a trial basis and should be interpreted and used with caution. Find out more about the NAEP mathematics achievement levels.
The chart below lists the percentages of twelfth-grade students performing at each of the NAEP mathematics achievement levels in 2024 and previous assessment years. Set the baseline at either NAEP Basic or NAEP Proficient to see the percentages of students performing at or above that NAEP achievement level. Click "Show all achievement levels" to see the percentages of twelfth-grade students at each of the NAEP achievement levels. Click "Hide all achievement levels" to see the percentages of students at or above the selected baseline NAEP achievement level. Use the slider to change focal years.
Figure Achievement-level results in NAEP mathematics for twelfth-grade students: Various years, 2005‒2024
National Student Skills
Student performance and skills on mathematics assessment questions
The NAEP mathematics assessment measures students' knowledge and skills in five broad content areas of mathematics (number properties and operations; measurement; geometry; data analysis, statistics, and probability; and algebra) and their ability to apply their content area knowledge to problem-solving situations. Because most measurement topics suitable for twelfth-grade students are geometric in nature, geometry and measurement are combined into one for reporting. The NAEP mathematics framework guides the content and development of the mathematics assessment. As specified in the framework, questions are classified by mathematical subtopic which is used to determine the key concept or skill that should be measured within each content area. Read more about the NAEP mathematics assessment.
To better understand twelfth-graders’ mathematics knowledge and skills across the content areas, student performance on samples of publicly released questions from the 2024 mathematics assessment at grade 12 are presented below. Click on "show details" for each question to see the mathematics content area, subtopic, question type, and description of the mathematics skills assessed.
Student performance below is expressed using two different metrics as follows:
- As the skills demonstrated by students performing at different points on the NAEP mathematics scale and within the score range for each NAEP achievement level. The descriptions below indicate what students at the designated score point were likely able to do when successfully answering the question as part of the 2024 grade 12 mathematics assessment. For example, twelfth-grade students with a score of 207 (NAEP Proficient) were likely to correctly answer a measurement and geometry question that required them to “Solve a geometric problem in 2 dimensions.”
- As the percentage of all students who received full credit for each question in 2024 compared to performance on the same set of questions that were administered as part of the 2019 assessment.
Please note, while there is no direct relationship between the position of a question on the scale and the percentage of students receiving full credit at the associated level in any given assessment year, both metrics are provided as different perspectives on student performance.