readingInformation About the 2005 Reading Assessment
reading: summary
reading: national trends
reading: state comparisons
reading: national student groups
reading: sample questions
mathematicsInformation About the 2005 Mathematics Assessment
mathematics: summary
mathematics: national trends
mathematics: state comparisons
mathematics: national student groups
mathematics: sample questions
information for
information for: media
information for: parents
information for: educators
information for: researchers
information for: policymakers
learn more
learn more: about naep
learn more: downloads & tools
learn more: glossary
learn more: help
State Exclusion Rate Tables
Reading
Mathematics
 

Percentages of Students in States and Jurisdictions Identified, Excluded, and Assessed in Mathematics

NAEP has always endeavored to assess all students selected as a part of its sampling process, including students who are classified by their schools as students with disabilities (SD) and/or as English-language learners (ELL) or limited English proficient (LEP). (LEP students are sometimes called English language learners). The decision to exclude any of these students is made by school personnel. School personnel are encouraged to use inclusion criteria provided by NAEP and may discuss their inclusion decisions with NAEP field staff. Some students may participate with testing accommodations.

Read more about the NAEP inclusion policy.

 

 
Accommodations
Permitted, Grade 4
Accommodations
Not Permitted, Grade 4
Accommodations
Permitted, Grade 8
Accommodations
Not Permitted, Grade 8
Percentages of all students identified as English language learners, excluded, and assessed, when accommodations were not permitted, grade 4 public schools: By state, various years, 1992–2000
 

 

1992

1996

2000

State/jurisdiction

Identified

Excluded

Assessed

Identified

Excluded

Assessed

Identified

Excluded

Assessed

Nation (public)

3

2

1

4

2

2

6

2

3

Alabama

#

#

#

#

#

#

1

#

#

Alaska

—

—

—

8

1

6

—

—

—

Arizona

8

2

6

12

7

6

16

7

9

Arkansas

1

#

#

#

#

#

1

#

1

California

22

10

12

26

12

14

27

7

20

Colorado

2

1

1

4

2

2

—

—

—

Connecticut

4

2

1

3

2

1

4

2

1

Delaware

1

1

#

2

1

1

—

—

—

Florida

4

2

2

6

3

3

—

—

—

Georgia

1

1

#

2

2

1

2

1

1

Hawaii

4

2

3

5

1

4

7

3

4

Idaho

2

1

1

—

—

—

5

2

4

Illinois

—

—

—

—

—

—

7

4

2

Indiana

#

#

#

#

#

#

1

1

#

Iowa

1

#

1

2

1

1

1

1

#

Kansas

—

—

—

—

—

—

5

2

3

Kentucky

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

Louisiana

1

#

1

1

1

#

1

1

1

Maine

#

#

#

#

#

#

1

#

#

Maryland

1

1

1

1

1

#

2

2

#

Massachusetts

3

1

2

4

2

1

6

3

3

Michigan

1

1

#

2

1

1

2

2

1

Minnesota

2

#

2

3

1

2

5

2

3

Mississippi

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

Missouri

#

#

#

1

#

#

1

#

#

Montana

—

—

—

#

#

#

2

#

2

Nebraska

1

#

1

2

1

1

4

3

1

Nevada

—

—

—

8

4

4

11

5

6

New Hampshire

#

#

#

—

—

—

—

—

—

New Jersey

4

2

1

2

1

1

—

—

—

New Mexico

4

1

2

10

5

5

20

6

14

New York

5

2

3

6

3

3

6

4

3

North Carolina

1

#

#

2

1

1

3

2

1

North Dakota

1

#

#

#

#

#

1

#

#

Ohio

1

#

1

—

—

—

1

#

#

Oklahoma

2

#

1

—

—

—

5

2

4

Oregon

—

—

—

6

3

3

6

2

3

Pennsylvania

1

1

#

1

1

#

—

—

—

Rhode Island

6

3

3

5

2

4

7

3

4

South Carolina

#

#

#

#

#

#

1

1

#

Tennessee

#

#

#

1

1

#

1

#

#

Texas

9

4

5

13

5

9

13

7

5

Utah

1

1

#

2

1

1

6

3

3

Vermont

—

—

—

1

#

#

2

1

1

Virginia

1

1

1

2

1

1

4

2

2

Washington

—

—

—

3

1

2

—

—

—

West Virginia

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

Wisconsin

1

1

1

2

1

1

5

3

3

Wyoming

1

#

1

1

#

#

2

1

2

Other jurisdictions

 

  

 

    

 

      

District of Columbia

4

2

1

6

4

1

6

3

4

DoDEA1

—

—

—

2

1

1

3

1

2

— Not available. The jurisdiction did not participate or did not meet the minimum participation guidelines for reporting.

# The estimate rounds to zero.

1 Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools). Before 2005, DoDEA overseas and domestic schools were separate jurisdictions in NAEP. Pre-2005 data presented here were recalculated for comparability.

NOTE: Details may not sum to totals because of rounding. States that did not participate in any of the mathematics assessments from 1992 to 2000 are not included in the table.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1992–2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Download and Print

Print This Page Download Mathematics Report

National Assessment of Educational Progress, National Assessment Governing Board
National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences
U.S. Department of Education