readingInformation About the 2005 TUDA Reading Assessment
reading: summary
reading: urban district results
reading: student group results
reading: district comparisons
reading: sample questions
mathematicsInformation About the 2005 TUDA Mathematics Assessment
mathematics: summary
mathematics: urban district results
mathematics: student group results
mathematics: district comparisons
mathematics: sample questions
information for
information for: media
information for: parents
information for: educators
information for: researchers
information for: policymakers
tuda learn more
tuda learn more: about naep
tuda learn more: about urban district
tuda learn more: downloads & tools
tuda learn more: glossary
tuda learn more: help

Percentages of Students in Urban Districts Identified, Excluded, and Assessed in Reading

NAEP has always endeavored to assess all students selected as a part of its sampling process, including students who are classified by their schools as students with disabilities (SD) and/or as English language learners (ELL) or limited English proficient (LEP). (LEP students are sometimes called English language learners). The decision to exclude any of these students is made by school personnel. School personnel are encouraged to use inclusion criteria provided by NAEP and may discuss their inclusion decisions with NAEP field staff. Some students may participate with testing accommodations.

The percentages of students excluded from NAEP may vary considerably across states and districts, as well as across years. Comparisons of achievement results across districts and within a district across years should be interpreted with caution if the exclusion rates vary widely. For example, at grade 4, the exclusion rates in Austin and Houston varied from those of the other districts.

Read more about the NAEP inclusion policy.

 

Percentages of all students identified as students with disabilities and/or English language learners, excluded, and assessed, grade 8 public schools: By urban district, 2005
 

2005

District

Percentage of all students
identified

Percentage of all students
excluded
Percentage of all students
assessed
Percentage of all students
assessed with accom-modations
Percentage of all students
assessed without accom-modations

SD and/or ELL

         

Nation

19 5 13 6 7

Large central city

23 5 18 7 12

Atlanta

11 4 8 5 3

Austin

27 12 15 2 13

Boston

24 6 18 10 8

Charlotte

18 3 15 9 6

Chicago

21 5 16 10 6

Cleveland

21 14 7 4 3

District of Columbia

19 8 11 9 3

Houston

24 7 16 3 13

Los Angeles

40 5 35 4 31

New York City

18 5 13 11 2

San Diego

31 7 24 6 18

SD only

         

Nation

13 4 9 6 3

Large central city

12 4 9 5 3

Atlanta

10 3 7 5 2

Austin

15 8 7 2 5

Boston

17 5 12 9 3

Charlotte

11 1 9 7 2

Chicago

16 3 13 10 4

Cleveland

18 12 6 4 2

District of Columbia

16 6 10 8 2

Houston

13 5 8 2 6

Los Angeles

12 3 9 3 5

New York City

10 2 8 8 1

San Diego

12 4 9 4 5

ELL only

         

Nation

6 1 5 1 4

Large central city

13 2 11 2 9

Atlanta

1 # 1 # 1

Austin

16 6 10 1 9

Boston

9 3 6 1 5

Charlotte

8 1 7 2 4

Chicago

6 2 3 1 2

Cleveland

4 3 1 1 1

District of Columbia

3 2 2 1 1

Houston

14 4 10 1 9

Los Angeles

35 3 31 2 29

New York City

10 4 6 4 2

San Diego

24 5 18 4 15

# The estimate rounds to zero.

NOTE: SD = students with disabilities. ELL = English language learners. Students identified as both SD and ELL were counted only once under the combined SD and/or ELL category, but were counted separately under the SD and ELL categories. Prior to 2005, students were identified as either ELL or non-ELL; in 2005 students were identified as ELL, non-ELL, or formerly ELL. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Download and Print

Print This Page Download Reading Report Download Mathematics Report