About the Assessment: District Inclusion RatesThe tables below show the percentage of students identified as students with disabilities (SD) and/or English language learners (ELL), and provide the rate of students excluded and accommodated in two ways: as a percentage of all students in the NAEP sample, or as a percentage of students identified as SD and/or ELL. Tables that provide percentages of SD students include those identified under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (Title 29 U.S.C. 794 Section 504), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap in federally assisted programs and activities. In addition, the percentages are further disaggregated in the SD tables by showing those who were identified as having an Individualized Education Program (IEP) . |
|
| Percentage of all students | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| District | Identified | Excluded | Assessed | Assessed without accommodations |
Assessed with accommodations |
| Nation (public) | 23 | 2 | 20 | 9 | 11 |
| Large city | 31 | 3 | 28 | 14 | 14 |
| Atlanta | 12 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 |
| Austin | 44 | 5 | 39 | 20 | 19 |
| Baltimore City | 19 | 9 | 11 | 1 | 9 |
| Boston | 35 | 6 | 30 | 13 | 16 |
| Charlotte | 19 | 2 | 17 | 4 | 13 |
| Chicago | 24 | 4 | 20 | 7 | 13 |
| Cleveland | 25 | 10 | 15 | 2 | 13 |
| Detroit | 20 | 3 | 17 | 7 | 10 |
| District of Columbia (DCPS) | 21 | 5 | 17 | 3 | 14 |
| Fresno | 38 | 3 | 34 | 29 | 5 |
| Houston | 43 | 3 | 40 | 22 | 17 |
| Jefferson County (KY) | 19 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 10 |
| Los Angeles | 46 | 1 | 44 | 37 | 7 |
| Miami-Dade | 21 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 16 |
| Milwaukee | 30 | 7 | 23 | 2 | 20 |
| New York City | 31 | 2 | 29 | 1 | 28 |
| Philadelphia | 22 | 4 | 18 | 2 | 15 |
| San Diego | 43 | 3 | 40 | 32 | 7 |
| NOTE: SD includes those identified under section 504. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. DCPS = District of Columbia Public Schools.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2009 Mathematics Assessment. |
|||||